Page 12 - CA_Blue( J )_Class9
P. 12
(ix) Generate first n multiples of numbers from 1 to the limit input by the user.
(x) Menu Driven programs.
Important: This list is indicative only. Teachers and students should use their imagination to create
innovative and original assignments.
EVALUATION
Proposed Guidelines for Marking
The teacher should use the criteria below to judge the internal work done. Basically, four criteria are being
suggested: class design, coding and documentation, variable description and execution or output. The
actual grading will be done by the teacher based on his/her judgment. However, one possible way: divide
the outcome for each criterion into one of 4 groups: excellent, good, fair/acceptable, poor/unacceptable,
then use numeric values for each grade and add to get the total.
Class design:
Has a suitable class (or classes) been used?
Are all attributes with the right kinds of types present?
Is encapsulation properly done?
Is the interface properly designed?
Coding and Documentation:
Is the coding done properly? (choice of names, no unconditional jumps, proper organization of conditions,
proper choice of loops, error handling code layout). Is the documentation complete and readable? (class
documentation, variable documentation, method documentation, constraints, known bugs—if any).
Variable and Description
Format for variable description:
Name of the variable Data Type Purpose/Description
Evaluation of practical work (Assignments) will be done as follows:
Subject Teacher (Internal Examiner): 100 Marks
Execution
Coding and
Criteria Class design Variable description OR
(Total100 marks) (20 marks) (20 marks) Documentation Output
(20 marks)
(40 marks)
Excellent 20 20 20 40
Good 16 16 16 32
Fair 12 12 12 24
Poor 8 8 8 16

