Page 22 - Math_Genius_V1.0_C8_Flipbook
P. 22
E:\Working\Focus_Learning\Math_Genius-8\Open_Files\01_Chapter_1\Chapter_1
\ 06-Jan-2025 Bharat Arora Proof-7 Reader’s Sign _______________________ Date __________
2 − 4
Example 14: Verify the closure property of subtraction for rational numbers and .
3 7
2 − 4 2 4 14 12 26
+
Solution: − = + = = , which is a rational number.
3 7 3 7 21 21
Hence, the closure property of subtraction is verified.
Commutative Property
Let us check whether the commutative property exists for the subtraction of rational numbers.
3
5
Consider the pair of rational numbers and .
9 9
5 3 2 3 5 − 2 2 − 2 5 3 3 5
Since, − = and − = . Clearly, ≠ , therefore − ≠ −
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
This shows that subtraction is not commutative for rational numbers. In other words, the
commutative property does not hold for the subtraction of rational numbers.
p r p r r p
In general, for any two distinct rational numbers and , − ≠ − .
q s q s s q
2 −4
Example 15: Verify that the subtraction for rational numbers x = and y = is not commutative.
3 7
2 − 4 2 4 14 12 26
+
Solution: x – y = − = + = = (Q LCM of 3 and 7 is 21)
3 7 3 7 21 21
−
− 4
y – x = 7 − 2 = −4 − 2 = −12 14 = −26
3
3
7
21
21
26 − 26
Clearly, ≠
21 21
2 − 4 − 4 2
Thus, − ≠ − , i.e., x – y ≠ y – x
3 7 7 3
Hence, subtraction of rational numbers is not commutative.
Associative Property
Let us check whether the associative property exists for the subtraction of rational numbers.
Let us take three rational numbers −5 , 3 and 5 .
7 14 14
−5 3 5 −5 − 2 −10 2 −8 −4
We have − − = − = + = or
7 14 14 7 14 14 14 14 7
−5 3 5 −10 3 5 −13 5 −18 −9
Again, 7 − 14 − 14 = 14 − 14 − 14 = 14 − 14 = 14 or 7
Clearly, −4 ≠ −9 , therefore −5 − 3 − 5 ≠ −5 − 3 − 5
7 7 7 14 14 7 14 14
This shows that subtraction is not associative for rational numbers. In other words, the associative
property does not hold for the subtraction of rational numbers.
Mathematics-8 20

